“Women in this world, and particularly in India, face
various kinds of gender disabilities and discrimination. It is notwithstanding
the fact that under the Constitution of India, women enjoy a unique status of
equality with men. In reality, however, they have yet to go a long way to
achieve this Constitutional status. It is now realised that real empowerment
would be achieved by women, which would lead to their well-being facilitating
enjoyment of rights guaranteed to them, only if there is an economic empowerment
of women as well. Till sometime back, the focus was to achieve better treatment
for women and for this reason, the concentration was mainly on the well-being
of women. Now the focus is shifted to economic empowerment. Such objectives
have gradually evolved or broadened to include the active role of women when it
comes to development as well. No longer the passive recipients of
welfare-enhancing help, women are increasingly seen, by men as well as women as
active agents of change: the dynamic promoters of social transformation that
can alter the lives of both women and men. It is now realised that there is a
bidirectional relationship between economic development and women’s empowerment
defined as improving the ability of women to access the constituents of
development-in particular health, education, earning opportunities, rights, and
political participation. This bidirectional relationship is explained by Prof.
Amartya Sen by propounding a theory that in one direction, development alone
can play a major role in driving down an equality between men and women; in
another direction, continuing discrimination against women can hinder
development. In this scenario, empowerment can accelerate development. From
whichever direction the issue is looked into, it provides justification for
giving economic empowerment to women. It is, for this purpose, there is much
emphasis on women empowerment (as it leads to economic development) by United
Nations World Bank and other such Bodies. Interestingly, the 2012 World
Development Report (World Bank 2011) adopts a much more nuanced message. While
it emphasizes the “business case” for women empowerment, it mainly takes it as
given that the equality between women and men is a desirable goal in itself,
and policies should aim to achieve that goal. Poverty and lack of opportunity
breed inequality between men and women, so that when economic development
reduces poverty, the condition of women improves on two counts: first, when
poverty is reduced, the condition of everyone, including women, improves, and
second, gender inequality declines as poverty declines, so the condition of
women improves more than that of men with development. Economic development,
however, is not enough to bring about complete equality between men and women.
Policy action is still necessary to achieve equality between genders. Such
policy action would be unambiguously justified if empowerment of women also
stimulates further development, starting a virtuous cycle. Empowerment of
women, thus, is perceived as equipping them to be economically independent,
self-reliant, with positive esteem to enable them to face any situation and
they should be able to participate in the development activities”.
~ Supreme
Court
No comments:
Post a Comment