The amplitude of
the term ‘occupation’ is limited by the economic imperative of livelihood
generation. Therefore, all the activities contemplated under Article 19(1)(g)
are essentially activities which enable a citizen to generate economic
benefits. The primary purpose and thrust of Article 19(1)(g) is to generate
economic benefit and to protect the fruits of one’s labour."
"The right to
contest an election to the legislative bodies established by the Constitution
is held not to be a fundamental right. Therefore, logically it would be
difficult to accept the submission that the right to participate in the
proceedings of the legislative bodies can be a fundamental right falling under
Article 19(1)(g). No citizen is entitled as of right either to become or
continue for the whole lifetime as member of a legislative assembly.
Acquisition of the membership depends on the decision of the electorate and is
conferred by a process established by law. Even after election, the tenure is
limited. Fundamental rights do not come into existence upon the volition of
others. They inhere in the citizens and are capable of being exercised independently
without the need for any action or approval of others subject only to the
restrictions imposed by law. Any member of a legislative assembly holds office
until such membership comes to an end by some process established by law.
Constitutional offices commencing from the office of the President of India are
meant for and established for securing the goals adumbrated in the preamble to
the Constitution. Each of these offices is a component in larger machinery
established to make it possible for the people of this country to realise the
goals indicated in the preamble of the Constitution. Any monetary benefit
incidental to the holding of such offices is only to compensate for the time
and energy expended by the holder of the office in the service of the nation.
It is for this very reason that a member of a legislative assembly cannot be
treated as holding office for the purpose of eking out a livelihood”
Supreme Court
No comments:
Post a Comment